>>27021 Sauce on 2nd pic?

There was a question in the old thread. If a new one is made, it would be good to link that, since the thread doesn't come up: >>26973

>>26973 That's more of a software issue. Check official documentation (https://www.arduino.cc/reference/en/libraries/can/) then go to StackOverflow. I default to them if an issue is outside of documentation.

>>27031 It was from a post on Twitter that is lost. Nothing of value to it aside from serving as a reminder that actuators can be hidden in a base with outputs being translated via string in tubes. Picrel is a Sukabi illustration of what a potential robot could look is using such a system. Everything in a box with cables going into her to communicate with whatever sensors are in the main body and transmit motion. It's good to remember that actuators can be used in many ways.

>>27021 Just found an interesting transmission system for servo motors that has what appears to be built-in compliance: >https://www.gobilda.com/3405-series-round-belt-5mm-cord-diameter-214mm-circumference/ >https://www.gobilda.com/3400-series-hub-mount-round-belt-pulley-14mm-bore-64mm-pd/ There's stretchy 5mm round belts available on the same site I got my GT2 hub pulleys. I had been thinking of a way to put in a compliant (stretchy) mechanism as a shock absorber cable for the pony leg/foot to match the biology, and this might be just the right thing. Black loctite works for rubber belts and o-rings, but not platinum cure silicone material. Some have reported Smooth On Sil-Poxy works for all of the above but I've not tried it yet. I might end up making a finger-like round belt mechanism that is fixed at the end of the hoof. This way, the belt drive would have built-in spring and damping for when the leg hits the ground vs regular inextensible toothed timing belts.

I have some vacuous ideas, not well formed, about ferrofluids. I found a good paper on these with good references also. It's worth saving if you are interested in that sort of thing. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2022/nr/d1nr05841j

>>27081 Your description reminds me of this: https://youtu.be/rY7IGdIvOyY

I've been trying to figure out how to convert rotational motion into linear motion for animating my papercraft waifu and learned about the Scotch yoke. It's probably one of the most basic mechanisms but I didn't see it mentioned in any of the threads so I thought I'd share it. For the joints I'm going to try using elastic bands and strings attached to little pins glued onto bamboo sticks on the back, but maybe there's a better way? I know jack shit about mechanical engineering.

>>28104 Neat! What a smooth, organic motion envelope Anon. That animation that shows that variable-position central pin, demonstrates that you can adjust such a mechanism on the fly, tuning it's leverage-advantage/power tradeoff, kinda like a transmission might. >that scoldy, Class President-chan tho Lo. A cute! :D Thanks Anon, cheers.

>>28104 I saw this before but forgot about it. It's certainly a good idea to keep in mind.

>>28104 This "Cyloidal Heringbone Rack and Pinion" could also be used for linear motion, but the motor would be in a different orientation. https://youtu.be/Cu5LvIYXbU0 While this Rigid Chain Mechanism here also does linear motion, but it's also similar to something I wanted to do. So it might come in extra handy. I was thinking of a loaded spring mechanism, where the spring would push the mechanism at the start so it would have some extra energy. This would have to go around the elbow, so it would need to be a chain. https://youtu.be/loCBrD4gRi4

>>28104 just have the output shaft of the motor reel in fishing line and you have your rotation converted to linear. can wind 2 fishing lines to same output shaft winding in different directions so that one reels in while the other extends to get opposing muscle groups assigned to each motor.

What motors could be used for the arms to achieve an A pose. Assume the arms are say 1kg and 2 feet long.

>>28143 See https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/levers-d_1304.html Assuming you’re talking about the shoulder rotating from arms-by-side “up” to an A-pose (or even a T-pose) - You’re looking at either a class 1 or 3 lever depending on how you transfer the force. 1. Make a spreadsheet with those equations and your length/mass parameters. 2. Make another sheet that calculates torque (force required) at all theta between 0 -> 90 (or 180, or just 40 for an A-pose, as you please) 3. Decide how long it can take to go from arms-by-side to your pose’s angle. You now have X degrees over T seconds 4. Select the spreadsheet row with the highest required torque to move (worst case) in your range of angles. This is how much torque your motor (or mechanism, in general) needs to be capable of. 5. Convert degrees-over-seconds to rotations-per-minute. You now have RPM and torque requirements. Use that to calculate power (mechanical watts or HP) 6. Select a motor that can output that much mechanical power PROVIDED you have a way to reduce it to your required RPM (most motors are above 2k, you’ll probably want under 30 RPM) 7. Can’t find anything? Start thinking over alternative mechanisms— you already know your force requirements, after all. Extra: integrate force over angle (or time) to calculate total energy required. Just be sure to normalize for time with a dT(theta) or theta(T) function (depending on what you integrated over)

>>28141 Ah, you mean a Twisted String Actuator? I had to translate your text with ChatGPT. The statement is describing a mechanical arrangement using a motor and fishing lines to convert rotational motion into linear motion. Here's a breakdown of the concept: 1. Output Shaft of the Motor: - The motor has a rotating output shaft. 2. Reeling in Fishing Line: - The fishing line is wound around the output shaft of the motor. - As the motor turns the shaft, the fishing line is reeled in. 3. Conversion of Rotation to Linear Motion: - The winding of the fishing line around the output shaft converts the rotational motion of the motor into linear motion. 4. Dual Fishing Lines with Different Winding Directions: - Two fishing lines are used, and they are wound around the same output shaft but in different directions. - This means that when the motor turns in one direction, one fishing line will be reeled in (shortened), and the other will extend (lengthen). 5. Opposing Muscle Groups: - The idea is to use this mechanism to engage opposing muscle groups. - For example, if one fishing line is reeled in, it could simulate a movement that engages one set of muscles. Conversely, if the other fishing line extends, it could engage a different set of muscles. 6. Overall Function: - By having two fishing lines wound in opposite directions on the same output shaft, the system can provide both contraction and extension movements, potentially targeting different muscle groups. This concept could be utilized in various applications, such as in rehabilitation devices or exercise equipment. The use of fishing lines allows for a flexible and lightweight means of transmitting motion, and by controlling the motor's direction, you can control the type of muscle engagement.

>>28165 no, not twisted string actuator. the string reels and never twists. This video explains the concept https://youtu.be/0emPU0bIwwc?t=1135 Also, will cogley uses the concept I'm describing here: https://youtu.be/MxbX9iKGd6w

>>28130 >This "Cyloidal Heringbone Rack and Pinion" could also be used for linear motion What a cool idea Anon, thanks! Cheers. :^)

>>28181 Nice content, thanks Anon. Yes, I've planned to use silk ribbons and 2 normal 'bobbin-like' spools affixed together to provide that sort of remote, bi-directional linear actuation system before. And I'm pretty sure ol' Leo DaVinci had a similar idea too! :D

>>28196 here's a drawing by will cogly showing his version of the rotational to linear mechanism I'm talking about. In my case, I would use a brushless dc motor instead and a complex pulley system instead of a geared brushed motor servo like he's using. My method would be much more powerful but his is much simpler to implement if you have the room for it.

>>28202 Thanks! Yes Bowden-cable -like arrangements are a good way to transmit force at some distance. That's a pretty good sketch IMO. >My method would be much more powerful That sounds very interesting. I'd love to be able to actuate the robowaifu's knee & elbow joints (not to mention ankles/wrists) in this fashion, to keep the actuation motors located back inside the torso near to the pelvic volume Center of Mass. This will ofc require much more power than, say, a single finger's force to be effective. Any chance you can let us in on your designs related to this?

>>28202 heres a few images to demonstrate my design on this matter

>>28229 the pulley system here was described in this video and demonstrated: https://youtu.be/M2w3NZzPwOM?t=576

>>28229 Thanks for clarification, that's one more good idea to keep in mind. I'm highly interested in doing things with strings, so this might be useful.

>Rigid robots can be precise but struggle in environments where compliance, robustness to disturbances, or energy efficiency is crucial. This has led researchers to develop biomimetic robots incorporating soft artificial muscles. Electrohydraulic actuators are promising artificial muscles that perform comparably to mammalian muscles in speed and power density. However, their operation requires several thousand volts. The high voltage leads to bulky and inefficient driving electronics. Here, we present hydraulically amplified low-voltage electrostatic (HALVE) actuators that match mammalian skeletal muscles in average power density (50.5 watts per kilogram) and peak strain rate (971% per second) at a 4.9 times lower driving voltage (1100 volts) compared to the state of the art. HALVE actuators are safe to touch, are waterproof, and exhibit self-clearing properties. We characterize, model, and validate key performance metrics of our actuator. Last, we demonstrate the utility of HALVE actuators on a robotic gripper and a soft robotic swimmer. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adi9319 via Kiwi on Discord

>>28229 Great post. That Archimedes pulley system is something I really, really need. The video is good too. I have like four or five of these snatch blocks like he showed in the video. Harbor freight. I need to lift some really heavy stuff and have been trying to find a good way. I have some cable That Archimedes pulley is perfect.

>>28274 Wow that sounds really exciting NoidoDev, thanks. I'd love to see this tech incorporated into opensauce robowaifus! Cheers.

>>28274 hydraulically amplified low-voltage electrostatic (HALVE) actuator used to control a small tube which controls a shut off valve to a large flow tube to muscle. I've had this idea for a while but haven't talked about it because it's not completely fleshed out and people complain I write too much so... but I'll talk about it anyways. I show high pressure tube but in fact it could be the same pressure. The idea is a spring operated rigid cut off valve which pushes a small area of the mass flow tube closed. The control tube uses a large surface area flexible bladder to push the valve open. The pressure pressing open the flow tube would be large because of the large surface area of the control tube bladder. What's the point of this? If you had to control this large flow tube for each muscle it would be too big to go through the bones or thread through the limbs. But if you have one big flow tube with individual T's off of it to each muscle and then used the smaller control tube you could thread a lot of tiny control tubes down and around the body. Like nerves. The big flow tube would be like the blood stream. Since the control tube has little flow it could still act quickly and since the large flow tube has a large flow it could fill the muscles quickly. I didn't draw it but the tiny control tube could be on a pivot. If the control tube activated it would let in fluid to the muscle(flow). If it turned off a spring could pivot it to a bleed line that would bleed the muscle when it turned off.

>>28447 I forgot to add, I personally much prefer electrically operated motors but I have had a hell of a time thinking of how I could get either a micro-controller close to what it actuated or all the mass of wires needed if it were placed in the chest. It would take a lot of manual labor to place all this stuff and that's not good. It would drive up cost extensively. Though I HATE hydraulics it may very well be that if a cheap enough valve can be engineered, and I think it can, it would be better to have a central pump in the chest and a bunch of small control tubes that control the flow to the muscles as I show. The control tubes could be really small as the volume of fluid needed to open the valve would be small making everything compact and relatively fast, if much slower than electrically operated motors. If you tried to add an individual tube for each muscle that would flow enough for each muscle the whole waifu would be one big ass mass of huge tubes. So yes this is...hydraulics, the New Jersey approach. Sigh...

>>28447 >>28449 This will be really interesting if you solve this Anon!

Good overview over a lot of mechanical principles. I thought about putting that into >>24152 but it's closely related to the servos and gears.

>>28522 Super cool! Wow I wish I'd seen this as a kid, Noido Dev. :D BTW, any idea what that system he's using for all this is? Looks kinda like Legos, but probably isn't. Thanks!

>>28546 >Looks kinda like Legos, but probably isn't No, those are all definitely Lego. The motors too, they come in a small number of sets. I have the exact same motor as the first one shown in an AT/AT.

>>28522 That's very cool.

>>28546 Pretty sure this is Lego Technic. I had some of it as as *****. I wasn't sure at first if it could be Fischer Technik, but no.

>>28567 Thanks!

Update on cheap motors from china: I now have 20 wife servomotors. I'll need 16 for 4 legs and a few to move the back and head. They're kind of vibraty, kind of grindy, not perfectly smooth, buuuut they only cost 100 each and I needed a lot. Also, they're weak, but I don't care for a proof of concept since it just has to move. I've got an idea for a relatively cheap diy actuator bldc+planetary that would be much more powerful if I have to upgrade and no other stock motor can do it. The motors will use CAN bus so I can get the skills for a robotics job, and I'll learn ROS, gazebo, mujoco, and isaac sim too. mujoco and isaac sim will be most useful for rapid simulation since it has elastic tendons and ROS/gazebo are useful for a robot job skill.

>>28738 Which project is this? Please post ongoing projects and updates in the prototype thread: >>21647 - This thread here should be used for general discussions on specific actuators.

for my tendon based actuator, i have PE fishing line and it is .63mm OD and I have a teflon tube that is 1mm ID that I want to thread with this fishing line. When I cut the line, the end is a bulge. How do I make the end pointed so I can thread the tube eye with it?

>>28859 Heat up the fishing line over a candle flame and stretch out the melted plastic until it breaks. With practice you can get the total stretch down to a few inches instead of a couple of feet, but either will work. This way the plastic will only taper without a bulge. For source idea, that's how we modelers make whip antennas for model military vehicles.

>>28738 what is mujoco and isaac sim?

>>28862 We have a whole thread on simulators >>155, at least mujoco is mentioned there.

>>27021 What do you guys think of these? Especially the second one where they made a model that mimics human walking efficiency? Both are from this week/last week. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20240127/Biohybrid-robot-makes-sharp-rotations-with-lab-grown-muscles.aspx https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011771

>>28866 https://neurosciencenews.com/robotic-human-walking-25509/

>>28860 thanks I'll try it should work I think

>>28867 Thanks, just some addition: >Summary: Researchers achieved a significant advancement in robotics by replicating human-like variable speed walking using a musculoskeletal model. This model, steered by a reflex control method akin to the human nervous system, enhances our understanding of human locomotion and sets new standards for robotic technology. >The study utilized an innovative algorithm to optimize energy efficiency across various walking speeds. This breakthrough paves the way for future innovations in bipedal robots, prosthetics, and powered exoskeletons. https://github.com/Shunsuke-KK/reflex_plos_revision

Turbines driven by air might be interesting in some edge cases or for long term for optimization. I had the idea watching a video on Tesla Turbines. These can work with air pressure, but have up and downsides: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/9XTEGrze920 I mainly think of turbines an additional booster for an electric motor, e.g. to make it start faster and reach some high torque faster under some load. Or the turbine (Tesla or other) kicks in when the motor is already at a high speed but needs some extra kick for a moment. This is of course more relevant for builds which would use some air muscles or stabilizers already. I don't want to start this whole general discussion again, I think pressurized air actuators can be useful if combined with other actuators. Problems with Tesla Turbines in particular, based on some comment on that video: - centrifugal forces warp the discs that results in touching from the discs under extreme high speed, this can cause failure but also abrasion over a longer period of time. - seems to need high speed and only works with high speed, would need a gearbox making it less efficient. - efficiency goes down to ~65% under load, similar to normal turbines - sensitive stall speed - higher rotational masses compared to other turbines

>>28910 hate turbines, this is 12th century technology i always wondered why you cant just send a balloon up into the ionosphere with a magnet, like the earth is already just one big solar magnet how hard can it be to put it to good use ffs

>>28911 Even if this was the case, how would we use this in a Robowaifu?

>>28910 We might be able to use a micro-turbine for the micro-rotary-engine, randoseru power pack? (>>28697, ...) After all Mazda made an awesome twin-turbo RX7 that was a rather-lightweight, relatively-inexpensive beast of a machine.

>>28921 With a balloon attached going up into the ionosphere?!

I feel like 20k is to much for this robot https://hello-robot.com/ do you guys have any suggestion to duplicate this telescopic approach much cheaper?

>>28943 Well, look for telescope actuators: https://youtu.be/X28CxOnxZh0[Embed] https://youtu.be/WavBXfh1giE[Embed] https://www.youtube.com/shorts/jWxARpHUVrg I recently had another one in my recommendations, but don't find it.

>>28943 >6x speed My fuggin sides are in orbit.

>>28957 ikr this is why I am thinking if there is a way to replicate this (make it faster) using pulley systems.

>>28958 why re-invent the wheel? just use rack & pinion.

>>28959 the problem is , if it lost energy in the height axis will fall, so I think a pulley system can keep it

>>28976 Screw-drive linear actuators for the main stalk, then. I love these things and use them in my mech projects. They only consume power when they move: to get them to maintain position you stop giving them power.

>>29007 that takes up a massive form factor and space is a great concern ruling such an actuator out for a humanoid with human form factor if you are going for humanlike full body articulation which requires so many more actuators that all are competing for space

>>29014 Oh, so you just want the approach, not building the same robot. I misunderstood this before. Do you mean the arm or the mechanism for up- and down? And how to put this into a human-like robot anyways?

>>29014 Not really...

you have your motor which acts as a muscle and gives the strength. look at the volume that takes up. then look at the volume taken by the gearing. if the gearing is taking up even close to as much space as the motor itself, then you are being very wasteful on space imo. that's why small pulleys to downgear like I posted earlier in this thread are WAY more efficient on space and get you your desired linear motion making them 100x superior to the type of linear actuators you all are posting now

also bonus points if the gearing can be relocated to another area than the motor and is not physically bound to a certain orientation with respect to the motor and required to be located at the same general location as the motor. this lack of flexibility in arranging motor and gearing gives you less options for negotiating fitting everything into your desired build volume of the robot. whereas pulley based downgearing gives you all the flexibility in the world and WAY smaller downgearing total volume taken up comparatively

>>29017 yes I'm building a different robot than any designs I've seen here but I am here to learn and share techniques. you say "Do you mean the arm or the mechanism for up- and down?" --- I am saying the bulky linear screw based actuator has too much hardware volume taken up by things that are not the motor itself and this volume is not something that should be given away so loosely as space is at a premium in value for a robot and must be guarded visciously if you want to fit enough stuff into the robot to do the things you want it to do (depending on how capable you want it to be of course). You say "And how to put this into a human-like robot anyways?" --- my concern is that fitting all the components one would like to fit to get the functionality one wants in the end is going to be a huge challenge we all face (unless we are creating like dumbed down super simple completely incapable robot toys that are laughably simple and incompetent in their capabilities.

>>28866 >>28867 >>28873 Good find! Adjusting power to actuators based on what is actually needed is essential for waifu efficiency! >>28910 Excellent out of the box thinking! Could be helpful for budget systems that need sudden bursts of power. Though, a proper coupling system to deliver power when needed, without imposing significant friction. >>28911 Explain how a magnet on a balloon could affect the actuation of a waifu. If you fail to do so, your post will be deleted. >>28921 >Power Randoseru Just like in Prima Doll! Though, routing kinetic energy from turbines into your waifu to animate her, is beyond my imagination at this point. >>28943 See >>29007 and >>29020 For the objectively correct answer on how to actuate the telescoping arm. >>28976 >Pulley maintaining static position sans power Are you referencing differential pulley systems (also known as differential/Chinese windlass)? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_pulley https://makezine.com/projects/the-chinese-windlass// Otherwise, there is too much friction in your pulley system. Without input power, the system should allow for the load to fall until it is stopped. >>29014 >>29030 >>29032 >>29034 I understand you are learning and likely have familiarity with pulleys. This being said, every method of reduction and translation of energy has its place and use. Pulleys are not universally superior in all applications. For a linear actuator based telescoping robotic arm, the precision/load capacity/simplicity of implementation of a stepper driven lead screw relative to its cost is essentially unbeatable. A pulley system can be used to achieve the same results, it will be more expensive, more complex, and require the same volume per work area. If you wish to argue your point, do so with engineering. Prove me wrong by designing and implementing a pulley based robot arm. Furthermore, try to think and breathe while your post. You are speaking with others who going through similar challenges and want to see you succeed. Be kind, always.

>>29061 >Just like in Prima Doll! Though, routing kinetic energy from turbines into your waifu to animate her, is beyond my imagination at this point. Haha, me too! :D Actually, I simply meant using the unified rotary/turbo engine coupled together with a smol electrical power generator as a means to keep her electrical systems functioning outdoors, beyond just the limits of her own batteries. > pic-related

>>28923 Kek. AS LONG AS YOU GIVE ME FREE HYDROGEN GENERATORS, ANON!111 :^) > (>>28681, >>28692)

>>29061 you say " A pulley system can be used to achieve the same results, it will be more expensive, more complex, and require the same volume per work area" --- a pulley system is not necessarily more expensive and absolutely would not require the same volume by a long shot. It would be SIGNIFICANTLY less volume taken and more importantly, the volume taken would be like a pen so long and skinny which is ideally suited for fitting into the limbs and torso of a humanoid form factor body. the screw is thick and the pulleys can be very flat so stackable. the full pulley system for a 64:1 downgear can be 4mm thick and 11cm long and less than 1cm wide and it is very easy to fit many of these in a stackable manner into any humanoid limb of one's design with the volume constraints of a human body. Attached is design imagery of a 3d model of the archimedes pulley system, then teal green boxes showing the total build volume of such a pulley system with measurements demonstrated with a metric ruler to scale all placed within a humanoid robot forearm to scale over the top of the bldc motors between the motors and where the skin will be. you can see how many you can stack easily. The pulleys themselves can be made using 1x3x1mm bearings or 2x5x2.5mm bearings for larger force areas if needed in some cases. each bearing costs $25/200 bearings on aliexpress for the smaller size I just listed. so around $0.13 so $0.91 for a full archimedes pulley 64:1 downgear system. The weight will be a MASSIVE decrease compared to a ball screw style. The outer containment flanges can be sewn on through the center of the bearing by way of needle and thread and can be made of very thin plastic. effectively free. the string/cable PE braided fishing line 70lb test or 130lb test. You say "Pulleys are not universally superior in all applications" --- I argue they are for all applications relating to humanoid robotics of substantial complexity and humanlike movement and capabilities and humanlike form factor due to their light weight, extremely low cost, and their not being needed to be physically located in the same vicinity of the motor which creates tremendous freedom for squeezing things into the human form factor with less limitations on space concerns. You say "For a linear actuator based telescoping robotic arm, the precision/load capacity/simplicity of implementation of a stepper driven lead screw relative to its cost is essentially unbeatable.' --- I disagree completely. Maybe for a 3d printer but not for a humanoid. You say "try to think and breathe while you post. You are speaking with others who going through similar challenges and want to see you succeed. Be kind, always." --- this infers I'm not being kind which is false. Prove I'm not. This also infers I neither think nor breath while I post. Both of these inferences are false and unkind and insulting making you a hypocrite.

also stepper motors have inferior power density as compared to bldc motors. a so you add weight and lose power by going that route instead of bldc. also steppers can tend to be loud-ish although I hear this can be solved in software. Also, the pulleys are essentially silent as are the bldc motors. a 2430 bldc motor pulls 200w and is $11 and the archimedes pulley system is $0.91 in parts for the bearings. it can downgear it 64:1 ratio. gears also are loud whereas this is silent way to downgear.

here's a drawing of a even more simplified version of the basic gearing pulley for such a system as I am talking about based on a small bearing.

for clarity here's a little *****med out image showing where all these archimedes pulley systems are in the arm design

i also developed an alternative pulley design based on a M1.7x4 PCB rivet as the center shaft and a copper butt connector (basically a hollow metal cylinder) of 1.5mm ID. they are a perfect fit. just have to cut the butt connector to length of around 3mm and then insert the hollow M1.7mmx4mm PCB rivet into it then flare the rivet and you now have your pulley. very easy to make. then run your string through. will need to be greased with white lithium grease. acts similar in principle to a door hinge. This setup should cost closer to $0.05 per pulley in the materials needed to make it. So it is cheaper than the bearing method above but might wear faster not sure. Chat gpt said it would wear faster.

I don't know why everyone acts like the physical robot is a solved problem. Inmoovs arm movement is limited, its face is expressionless, it has no legs, I haven't looked into it much but it probably doesn't have a mechanism for keeping its upper half balanced either. Poppy is better however those actuators are prohibitively expensive and even then it needs to be handholded into walking. Its also a small robot. I don't know if pulleys are a good idea but the way they usually work is by leverage rope length, a robot doesn't have space to work with, quiet the opposite.

>>29065 do you really need all those wires though

>>29071 I'll see if I can record a vid of SPUD's torso copying the angle of her GY-521 gyroscope. Should be a relatively safe demonstration since she is currently sitting on a support stand rather than her own legs right now.

downgearing by way of a worm screw: the finer the thread pitch the more it is downgearing right? but that is capped I'd assume. what is the higher end to downgearing ratio that can be achieved with this method of downgearing like 6:1? we'd want more like 64:1

>>29079 I'm assuming you are called the black lines in the main model wires when in fact they are just indicators connecting parts to labels and other parts like when you draw a picture and draw little lines pointing to objects in the picture and part of the line comes near the object it is pointing to and the other end of the line goes up to the text that labels what the part is. I noticed you did a picture of gears in your post. well I explained why those preferrably are to be avoided: noisy, physically located at top of motor so less flexibility in design as far as moving them around to other areas where you have more room, etc.

>>29065 Tad odd, I'm usually defending pulleys. In this case, I would be happy to make a linear robot arm with a lead screw if you'll make an arm with pulleys. Howabout a friendly competition to see which is best in practice? >>29088 There are many factors which affect functionality of lead screws. These resources provide good information for anyone learning about screw based actuators. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadscrew https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jrcs8lS7-M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BstZUC4tcOA

based on those videos, it looks like we might be looking at lead screws giving us a ballpark of 5:1 or 6:1 downgearing on the high end. What we want for a typical 2430 bldc motor is 64:1 at least if not 128:1 which can be achieved easily in a very small volume by way of pulleys. It does not appear lead screws offer significant down gearing at all like this

chat gpt and I discussed this just now and I'm gettign this: 64:1 is the very least downgearing we'd need. can a single lead screw give us that extreme downgearing or not? ChatGPT Achieving a 64:1 downgear ratio with a single lead screw might be challenging. Lead screws are generally better suited for lower gear ratios, typically up to 6:1 or 8:1. As you increase the gear ratio, the mechanical efficiency and precision can be compromised. For very high downgear ratios like 64:1, a pulley system, as you initially mentioned, may be more suitable. Combining multiple pulleys in a system, as per Archimedes' principles, allows for efficient torque multiplication and can achieve the higher ratios you're aiming for. In summary, while a single lead screw might struggle to provide a 64:1 downgear ratio efficiently, a pulley system could be a more viable solution for your specific needs.

interestingly, the lead screw idea involves clearly metal rubbing on metal and no bearing surfaces it seams to me. just like a nut and bolt it looks like. perhaps some are more sophisticated but I digress. I was thinking we could make pulleys also by having a shaft inside another shaft and the outer shaft rotates over the inner shaft - like the rivet drawing I made earlier, but shaped more like a bearing pulley in overal shape like the drawing I showed of a bearing based pully. This would remove the balls and so have more of a metal on metal approach but could be more robust for handling higher forces put onto it without crushing the bearing balls or warping the bearings. I noticed the load capacity of tiny bearings is startlingly and alarmingly low. like the 1x3x1mm ones are like 10lb only and the 2x5x2.5mm ones are like 35lb. the complexity of their design and larger number of moving parts they have make them vulnerable at these tiny sizes. So going with a metal on metal 2 part non-ball door hinge-like design (basically like fusing all the balls together with the core as one mass of metal) can make it able to handle way more forces evne if it loses some of the extreme frictionlessness it has. thoughts?

also for reference as a side note: your typical hobby servo motor which employs a dc brushed motor has gears integrated into the box it comes in that downgear that motor 180:1. so when I say we need at least 64:1, now you can see why. Higher speed, small, lower torque motors like the 2430 bldc motor need a ton of downgearing just like these small brushless dc motors in order for them to convert all of their inherent speed down to big torque and more moderate speeds. that is the principle at hand. lead screws primarily convert rotation to linear motion but are not really intended to be big downgearing approaches as they only offer very minor downgearing

Can't nitinol be used?

>>29071 >I don't know why everyone acts like the physical robot is a solved problem. Literally nobody does so. >pulleys are a good idea but the way they usually work is by leverage rope length I'm coming more and more to the conclusion that some soft parts should internally be made out of rope. >>29102 >Can't nitinol be used? >>1747 and >>13723

>>29092 What is this whole discussion even about?! The initial posting >>28943 showed a non-human robot. That's how I answered it, though it's kind of OT, until we get a thread for helper bots for chores. I focused on the telescope arm part. Obviously a inline screw drive or any screw-drive linear actuator might make sense for the vertical movement, though it would be worth contemplating why the hello-robot team didn't use them. More importantly, why on earth would anyone use that for the arm?! Also, how and why would anyone use a telescope element in a humanoid waifu(!) robot at all?! Could anyone picture that and maybe draw it for those who can't, so that we can all see how weird this would be looking? I assume >>28911 and >>28943 are troll attempts, and it would be worth contemplating to delete or move these together with the responses.

>>28202 That looks very useful. I had something like this in mind for some use cases, but it's good to have a few references. Especially combining it with a pulley: >>28229 >>28447 >>28449 >HALVE Thanks, very useful explanation. I guess for a lot of small valves piezo electric ones might be the right ones. I was thinking a while ago about using water bags as some kind of holding torque and a valve in between. So for example the chest could tilt sideways, but if water is in the bag inside and the valve closed it won't. If the valve is open it might tilt, in case a muscle is pulling it then it would certainly.

>Cycloidal Hub Gearbox Might require a resin printer and work better with a laser cutter https://youtu.be/IKkw4d7jyu0 https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:5437152 https://www.printables.com/model/333438-3d-printed-planetary- https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1apuReZyJan5Dxpbf_ou8xmFl2_huDlke >What makes cycloidal gearboxes so amazing? https://youtu.be/8GDMShY8vAU >I discovered something really interesting about cycloidal gear drives that I did not expect! In this video, I use a 3D printed gearbox to demonstrate just a few of the reasons why cycloidal gearboxes are so useful. Then a video on "CNC Machined vs 3D Printed Cycloidal Drive": https://youtu.be/mPwbDrXq50Q - with the result that the CNC one is much heavier but the 3D printed one broke under heavy load and didn't have as much torque. Down to 50% under strong load. This might mean a smaller CNC machined one would be better or that we need to use galvanization for the 3D printed parts. It might also be so that the motor can't be too strong, so with a relatively weak motor it doesn't matter.

>In this electronics basics episode we will have a closer look at motor encoders. Those can not only turn any motor into an awesome and satisfying input device for your projects; but can also turn any kind of motor into a kind of stepper motor. There are many different types of such encoders. So let me show you how they work, what they do and how you can use them. https://youtu.be/d3IH8zwUVYU https://www.solomotorcontrollers.com https://www.youtube.com/@SOLOMotorControllers

Thanks for your nice inputs here, Noido Dev. Cheers.

>>25792 Hey Kiwi, > I have a new hoverboard which uses a cheap Chinese chip that no one has figured out how to hack yet. It looks like that chip is here, under the "Three Gate Driver Chips" picrel. Click on the MM32SPIN05/06 = 2 boards link. https://github.com/RoboDurden/Hoverboard-Firmware-Hack-Gen2.x/wiki I got there from here: https://github.com/RoboDurden/Hoverboard-Firmware-Hack-Gen2.x RoboDurden seems to be one of the masters at reflashing hoverboards. Hope this helps.

I found this guys video channel on YouTube where he covers an extraordinary amount of actuators and motors and damn near everything. It covers not only all types of electric motors, also, pneumatic, hydraulic and even covers all the math from the very basics to do detailed analysis of all of these. And all the parts needed plus programmable logic control and circuits to control all these things. A PILE! As I was scrolling through his set of instruction videos it blew me away the depth of material this guy covers. It would be well worth bookmarking this and when you have a question scroll through his videos as an answer, while maybe not easy, is likely there. https://www.youtube.com/@bigbadtech/videos?view=0&sort=dd&shelf_id=0

>>30048 Yeah, that looks like a goldmine, Grommet. Thanks very much! :^) yt-dlp -i https://www.youtube.com/@bigbadtech/videos Do it today, /robowaifu/ anons! :^)

I seem to have found a kind of actuator that hasn't been mentioned before but im not sure? Apparently there is something I think is called an electromagnetic feedback linear actuator. So far this is only one I could find. It seems similar to a solenoid but it apparently isn't. I assume the price when hidden like this is they price you base on how many you want to buy. I am not looking to buy anything so not looking for a quote myself so I can't be bothered to ask them. https://irisdynamics.com/products/orca-series https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZ7T1H1uPSc These seem ideal in sense of being fairly quiet since I find nothing *****y about a robowaifu that sounds like a power drill from screw based linear actuators.

After attempting to work with servomotors to animate a simple leg, I gave up on this idea due to the weakness of the system. With the help of ChatGPT, I realized that I needed to switch to a pneumatic system instead." Servomotors: Frequently employed in hobbyist applications such as small-scale robots and precise motion control systems like those found in 3D printers. Pneumatic Motors: for average applications like automotive assembly lines. Hydraulic Motors: powered by hydraulic fluid, utilized for heavy-duty machinery like bulldozers, providing high torque. The next challenge is figuring out how to set up a pneumatic solution, as there isn't a plug-and-play option available on marketplace. Here's a list of products that can do the job: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005005870528273.html - air cylinder https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000329351824.html - valve to connect between the air cylinder and the air pump https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005006519202716.html - basic electrical air pump for easier modification ability. https://aliexpress.com/item/1005005209160156.html - For the question of controlling airflow, solenoid valve can do the job to on/off the air flow through a dev board https://aliexpress.com/item/1005005209160156.html https://bc-robotics.com/tutorials/controlling-a-solenoid-valve-with-arduino/ Now it's time to put this brainstorm into action!

>>30222 >Irisdynamic's Orca Actuator I'm pretty sure this was mentioned before, since I knew about it. But thanks anyways! The issue was that even the smallest ones they had a few years ago were quite big and heavy. Close maybe, but still rather a bit big. Though, these might be very useful to build VR rigs moving a vehicle simulator smoothly around. So I guess and hope this company will stick around. I would't rule them out completely, it's good to keep an eye on it. >>30245 >pneumatic system Thanks, keep us updated on it please, whatever comes out of it.

>>30245 What servo were you using? What kind of leg did you set up? Length and mass of the upper and lower leg. Post pictures.

>>30251 chat logs are there: https://alogs.space/robowaifu/res/418.html#13541 I spent 100 euros on this, but upon reflection, I believe I could achieve a more cost-effective solution by using a pneumatic equipment.

>>30256 So, the leg is equivalent to a 100cm doll leg, safe to assume a steel skeleton? Moving with thick silicone providing resistance. The link to your servos doesn't work. I'd use 40kg.cm servos as a minimum if you replaced the steel skeleton with a low density plastic. 80 to 100+ if you kept the steel skeleton. Servos usually are represented with their stall torque parameters. Do the math for the leverage force needed and multiply it by 4 to find your stall torque. This is because servos are designed to reach their stall torque for brief moments. As an example; to set up a simple robot maid arm, with upper arm length of 23cm lower arm 22cm and her joints and end effector add up to 5cm. To lift a kg load, assuming the arm has a total mass of a kg, you'd multiply distance 50cm by half mass of the arm .5kg plus load 1kg to get 75kg.cm. Based on that, you'd want to use a 300kg.cm servo in her shoulder. This is just a simplification to demonstrate how high torques can be at human scales.

>>30256 Ah, you are that guy. Nice to see you back. >>30258 >80 to 100+ if you kept the steel skeleton Steel doesn't need the same diameter, a combination of plastic an steal might be a bit heavier than just plastics but much stronger. >calculation Interesting, thanks.

>>30250 >I'm pretty sure this was mentioned before, since I knew about it. Possibly. I mainly was searching for the word "magnet" and nothing came up. Didn't think of searching by manufacturer branding. >The issue was that even the smallest ones they had a few years ago were quite big and heavy. Hm looking at the Orca 6 LITE the mechanical body is 2.4 kg (5.29 lbs) and the shaft is 1.38kg (3.04lbs). Im not sure why the cheapest one is no lighter than most other models.

>>30245 >>30250 Check out Clippard Minimatic. They have pretty much been the leaders in small-scale pneumatic systems for labs and process control for production lines. Lots of their stuff is on ebay. https://www.clippard.com/

>>30258 Indeed, the skeleton was made up with steel tubes, but going forward, I'll switch to 2020 aluminum profiles for improved design customization. I was used 35kg.cm or 50kg.cm Indeed, the challenge with servos lies in the scale of torques required for human-scale applications, where the servo motor torque needs to match the demands of the human skeleton. However, the downside of this is that the motor torque capability of the servomotor is determined by its size. I am hopeful that I will not encounter this issue when dealing with a pneumatic system instead of a servo system. >>30260 Thank you, It's great to be back in the world of robotics, I thought Elon Musk's Optimus robot would dominate the field, but still waiting :| >>30266 Nice found, Bing AI shared me several cool website: https://makerindustry.com/pneumatic-robot-arms/ https://www.rowse-pneumatics.co.uk/blog/post/pros-and-cons-of-pneumatic-robots https://www.quincycompressor.com/how-a-pneumatic-robot-arm-works/

Interesting high ration gear reduction. From the most excellent Robert Murray-Smith. He is another one of those with videos on a huge amount of stuff. Mostly DIY. In this he shows the gear and where it came from plus has links to 3D print files to make your own, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsFHEf-oRk4 He's another you might be interested in bookmarking. Look at his hundreds of videos. He started with a lot of battery, super capacitor, inks and then decided to spread out into all sorts of DIY gears, wind mills, materials, lots and lots on all sorts of electric motors and a ton of stuff. Of particular interest to me is his graphene production. He shows many ways to make it. One of the most recent you use a blender, graphite and whey, yes, whey, to make a liquid solution of graphene. He made some of this and put it in an old fashioned Casein glue/plastic(I believe). Casein is good stuff on it's own. They used to glue airplanes together with it before epoxies. He added 1/2% of graphene and made a bulletproof puck a centimeter or so thick(I think the plastic is casein based but not sure). They shot it with a 9mm and no change. They made a hook with it and suspended some huge guys off of it and the steel rings broke before the hook. This is one way to make extraordinarily strong plastics. It would make a fine skeleton. I wonder if it would do the same in a polyester matrix resin like they use for fiberglass but substitute graphene or glass/graphene combination? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXZ1gfJMtW4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcLd4h095DQ 1943 Unbreakable Plastic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoGPRXjCwwA

BTW this new research on making graphene cheaply means in not too long you will begin to see this stuff in all sorts of things. Consumer products like sporting goods first and eventually in airplanes and stuff like that. It will bring super high efficiency because it will make things so lightweight. This has all sorts of second order effects. If you make it lighter, you need smaller motors to move stuff and smaller motors also makes it lighter so now they are even smaller, this stuff compounds making ever higher performance with ever less materials.

>>30293 >>30294 Thanks for the channel recommendation. This guy really covers a lot of different things and his video output rate is really high. I've been excited about graphene for a long time. Glad to see that more R&D effort is being spent on it.

>>30309 I wish to bring to your attention two of his videos that seem to me to be the best. He has thousands and I've seen most. Here's simple ways to make graphene. One is a method to make graphene foam. title to search for "Making Graphene Foam From Table Sugar" The next is how to add whey. This keeps the graphene from recombining. I'm not sure if you need this. Maybe you could grind up from the first method and that would be good enough. There does seem to be a problem with dispersion into powders. With the liquid method you have a liquid. He was using it to reinforce concrete and getting really strong concrete. "If" you wanted to mix with a powder the whey treated graphene you would need to dry it. He says centrifuge. None of this is beyond kitchen chemistry. The strength of this stuff is off the charts. it makes steel look weak and likely anything you can get to mix it in will become super strong. "1933 Blood Graphene - A Way To Make Graphene From Blood, Eggs Or Milk"

Has there been any robots that used a shape memory polymer as an actuator? I know nitinol has been used for tiny bots. SMPs seems to rebound a fair amount faster than nitinol from what i can see in videos. You can actually even buy SMP filaments for 3D printing. Though problem I see is even if you use a mechanism to heat it locally and controlled the state such filament regains it's original shape is increased heat which also is what is required to reshape it so it's difficult to tell how much push or pull force it can provide.

Switched reluctance motors are great for gaining a better understanding of the physics which governs motor movement. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IUVjp03On8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAhF45AtsgA

>>30353 Yes, they're about 1~5% efficient, are slow, need high precision heat control, do not work in cold or hot environments without good engineering, etc... Though cheap and easy as crisps, they just have too many problems. I like them and wish they can be cheap and electroactive while requiring sub kV range voltages If you're interested, read papers published on them and try to make your own. There's plenty of room for improvements and I'd be grateful to have a viable alternative to heavy gear motors. PLA and plastic polymers based on it could be a great and cheap start to your research. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiOn-LqW4KI

>>30353 I don't know why I overlooked that, but some of us want to use water cooling inside, then store it and it might be used for muscles (e.g. nylon) which are just complementary. I also think small muscles might make sense in some places, e.g. the face. > SMP filaments Thanks, I'll look into it. >>30549 Interesting, especially with that video, thanks.

>>30549 Isn't that 1-5% just for one specific kind the kind of coiled nylon muscles or I may be getting mixed up. Though I came across info on why heat is a poor activator, it is faster to heat an object than cool it so it isnt exactly even how it operates. Doing more digging I just now came across solid state actuators which includes things such as ionic polymer metal composites which seemingly can operate at low voltage. Ive yet to figure out performance and possible use of them. Im not sure why they think only make a flat object instead of a design that can have pulling force like a cross pattern or something XXXXXXXXX but maybe it would be too weak to be of use? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894723027079 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1jkAQ-pBpU >>30557 Id question using water. My thought was using electric heating wires to control the SMPs but Im second guessing using SMPs that require temperature changes.

>>30578 >Id question using water. My thought was using electric heating wires to control the SMPs We had this several times during the years, not sure if something changed. If you have wires bending then they might break. I recall some video testing these actuators and the results simply weren't good. Good look anyways, but always keep in mind it has to work 10k*X times or 100k*X times.

>>30353 You are probably the same who posted it, I'm just linking it here: Silicone shape memory polymer >>30584 - Idk, maybe this will be interesting for smaller muscles, like in the face.

> Homebuilt Electric Motors Just leaving this here for now. https://www.bavaria-direct.co.za/

>Servo Horn: Pick the right one. via >>30927

>>27021 >Boston Dynamics Atlas runs on hydraulics but it's a power guzzler and heavy Their hydraulic Atlas was retired and they have an electric one now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29ECwExc-_M

Well, the idea of using a rotary cylinder fueled by air or oil seems outdated now. Thank you Boston Dynamics, for saving me time and money, I guess :p Looking at how their servos look, the idea would be to DIY our own servomotor with a large AC or DC motor :/

It's the servo motors that make up the structure of this robot, the mistake was to set a structural basis and attach servo motors to it.

>>30969 Heh, they are going to run into the whole power/mass ratio issue now, same as all the other humanoid robotics companies. Burning hydrocarbons is a very energy-dense way to motivate cars (or robots). Now they are taking the 'EV' pill, they will be on level ground with say, Optimus. >tl;dr BD has a long row to hoe now. But of course the perceived """superiority""" of their competition will probably light a bigger fire under the other vendors. This, ofc, should accelerate the eventual introduction of home-based service robots -> companion robots. All of them GH Surveillance-State Specials, sadly. >>30970 Great insight, Anon. I've been trying to think several design approaches for a while that take advantage of this very concept. Volume is certainly one of the several severe constraints we're all up against here.

>>30969 >Well, the idea of using a rotary cylinder fueled by air or oil seems outdated now. I wouldn't be so quick to rule out hydraulics. I HATE hydraulics. I've complained about them a lot but...with the right valves they are super cheap and they solve a lot of problems. I much prefer straight electric but to have lifelike waifus hydraulics would be far easier to do and MUCH easier to mass produce. In the video here, >>30956 He talks about spending 35 hours straight soldering alone. One of the main problems with hydraulics in terms of efficiency , in machinery anyway, is that the pumps run all the time and bypass flow the extra pressure not needed. The problem is if a pump is set for max pressure and flow then when not using max, it waste an a enormous amount of power. But, if we use electricity to control a pump and have some accumulator to store pressure then the efficiency becomes much better.(So that no one whines, I note, yes "some" hydraulic systems have some control over the pump but most still waste some amount of energy flowing back pressure.)

Here's an idea. First visualize one of those party toys that is a rolled up flat sheet-tube. You blow on it and it unrolls and makes a cylinder. So instead of blowing the inside and unrolling it, we have it full of fluid and compress it to push out the fluid. Roll it up. Long skinny bladder with an iron covering that can still roll up. We doing the opposite of the party blower thing. To operate it put an electric field on the end and the bladder will try to pull in the iron just like a solenoid. But since it's a long tube the only way to do so is to roll up, forcing out the fluid. This is srt of whacked "but" since all of your muscles would be made of badders and bladders could be cast "theoretically", for the whole body at one time with liquid plastics/rubber. Once you had the pattern you could churn them out.

Since actuators are all tied up with the sensors to position them, a reference to a comment I made in the skin section that may be relevant here also. >>30980

>>30974 >iron covering I wish to make this more clear because people may get the idea it's some big iron plate. No, it could be iron oxide particles embedded in silicon or rubber. If you notice while this is a different form I have not given up on the idea of inductive reactance motors. Mostly because they are cheap, fast, lightweight and powerful for their size. Yes you can do a little better with super expensive rare earth magnets but...they're super expensive and do you want a magnetic waifu that has metal sticking to it, I think not.

>>30982 force is proportional to mass, some dust isnt going to create a lot of force

https://www.zygotebody.com/ There are so many muscles/actuators to set up for just one arm, and the deltoids are composed of three smaller muscles :o Indeed, it would be much easier to use only three large servomotors that control Yaw, Pitch and Roll rotations. https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005003988911701.html However, the issue is that the rpm is really slow for acceptable torque: 24V, 11rpm, 85kg.cm Perhaps a 1000W Brushless DC Motor coupled with a gear set would do the job. But since I cannot find the gear set, I might have to build it myself, possibly with the help of the following website for delving into gear configurations and building custom solutions: https://drivetrainhub.com/gears/

>>30988 Nice observations, Anon. Please continue! Cheers. :^)

>>30988 or you can downgear by way of pulleys instead of gears which will be a more quiet outcome and imo easier to make than gears. Just need small bearings and some scrap plastic and some string and a sewing needle and scissors as only tools.

>>30984 >force is proportional to mass, some dust isnt going to create a lot of force No F=MA You left out the A part and the A in this case is due to the electromotive force on the, as you call it, dust. I assure you if you get between the "dust" and a 20 Tesla magnet you will feel some serious force.

>>30988 >three large servomotors that control Yaw, Pitch and Roll Yes much easier but it would look too much like a robot to me. Obviously this is an issue with me, others might not mind this. Of course trying to replicate the muscles in a human body complicates things a good deal but...that's what I would find more attractive.

>>30990 Thank you :] I've tallied up four large servomotors for one leg, so it might cost around 100 euros of servos, assuming each of them has a torque of 1 Nm: www.aliexpress.com/item/1005005428153048.html Cheers >>30995 Oh like a bicycle's gearing system, sounds like an interesting challenge to take on >>30997 Interesting thought, the tactile sensation of touching filament, indeed differs from the hardened material of servomotors

>>30999 I think it would be more like a stringbike rather than a normal chain and sprocket system wouldn't it? >>30995

>>31002 well not like a bike at all imo. A bike is downgearing by way of sprocket and chain. Even string and pulley in continuous rotation is not ideal imo. You want pulley blocks like these photos but way way smaller custom made with bearings and plastic discs and fishing line and super glue

>>30996 This. The rare-earths are used to greatly 'amp up' the electromagnetic properties of the basic electro magnets themselves. Kind of like how you need trace (tiny amounts of) otherwise-often-harmful-micronutrients (like cyanide) for your cells to properly manufacture the incredibly-yuge swath of proteins vital for your metabolic processes, these trace amounts of rare earths significantly enhance magnets -- especially when they are at cold temps! (Say, around liquid nitrogen realms.) >>30999 Good luck aydoll! If I haven't yet given you the 'official' greeting yet, welcome! :^) >>31004 As a country boy, I'm quite familiar with block & tackle. It's absolutely amazing the force multiplier that can be achieved with this simple machine.

>>30999 For some reason the crotch reminds me of a robosapien... I think it is the slight angle where the codpiece meets the first hip joint.

Some Pulley adjacent actuators https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QEgNbaDCjw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utDagouxM5U https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bzsw-3sJ-I8

>>31012 >For some reason the crotch reminds me of a robosapien... I think it is the slight angle where the codpiece meets the first hip joint. IMHO, this literally the most critical design spot on the entire robowaifu. Everything else depends on the pelvis/hip confluence being correct to function well as an overall bipedal locomotive system (not to mention snu-snu working properly).

>>31013 Excellent resources, Kiwi. Thanks! :^)

Tesla Bot Motors: https://youtu.be/5MNz0YyqgLY https://youtu.be/1xChD-gv_pc

Capstan actuators are cool, quiet, and efficient! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwIBTbumd1Q

>>31403 >Capstan actuators I came online just to link this. You beat me too it. I second that this is a really great video and has a lot of big ideas. He talks about the mechanics of his drives in such a way that the info could be used for all sorts of drives. BTW the change in the look and operation of the website is...not good. It does not seem to function as well and is harder to read. When I go to references and hover over them, some show the reference, some don't. The old look and function was better...unless you can upload files now, in which case it's better to suffer. I notice this happens A LOT with software. They take something perfectly functional but has a sort of older look and spiff it up in the "new style", like Apples sort of flat candy look, and then it never works as good. It loses functionality and becomes harder to read and use. Don't get me started on Apple iphones. I have one, given to me, and it's a total usability piece of shit. There's all these beautiful icons that, have no explanation. There's all sorts of functions that if you get into them, there's no clear way to back up out of them and you can't read anything. What use is a device with no instructions but hieroglyphics that you have to go online in order to figure how to use it? Apple is the peacock tail of computers, the Thorstein Veblen of conspicuous consumption.

This is a first class link. It's a way to use low cost materials to make very powerful linear actuators. Something I've been talking about. I talked about using belts for windlasses but had not figured out how to recirculate the belts, and/or rope yet. I've been doing drawings of these but can't post drawings here so I gave up trying to describe them...Here's where I mentioned them >>31081 >>31087 My pitiful efforts have not come up with near, or even close, to the tidy package these guys have. I think there's some ways to optimize what they have done though their work is impressive . Don't miss this link. it's a great leap in linear actuator thinking that could lead to a good deal of progress. https://www.linearmotiontips.com/differential-windlass-drives-how-new-designs-work-for-linear-motion/ Why is this so good? I have talked before about using cycloids for bearings. Normal bearings are made of metal because the area they connect is so small. Therefore you need a super strong well machined surface. Big $$$$$. But if you can spread the forces out plenty of plastics and especially fiber reinforced plastics work not only as well but better because of some of the springiness of the material allows for some give. Meaning less likely to break. Manufacturing these sort of things could be easily done with a simple vacuum infusion set up with an accurate, but easily made die/mold for the form. Big time DIY.

>>31576 They have a great video here. It reiterates why I complain about hydraulics and the losses(though I have some changes in mind about this because I think hydraulics might be easier to mass produce.) https://youtu.be/Rp_kmhphpyk It kills me that I was so close to something like what they have, but too late.

>>31576 >https://www.linearmotiontips.com/differential-windlass-drives-how-new-designs-work-for-linear-motion/ Excellent information Anon. I've tried designing low-friction systems that follow similar concepts -- yet remain low-cost. (Faux) silk ribbons are a reasonably-good cording choice IMO; strong, light, resilent, and slippery as an eel ! :D Thanks Grommet. Another great post. Cheers. :^) >=== -minor edit

>>31577 You can just use Chinese/differential windlasses. They only own patents for over complicated versions. Vidrel has all the information you need. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfaeVPQO2ek

>>31624 Neat! This gentleman is a wellspring of old lore. Thanks, Anon. Also, be sure to check out the next, related video of that playlist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXzGSB4i1UU&list=PL6HIFled82YVpPbRjhcfF7z5R-tmTAJiE&index=8

>>31403 >>31432 >Capstan actuator/drive Seems we all are in the recommendation algorithm loop for this. It seems pretty useful but I wonder what the ideal "rope" would be whether it is steel cable or nylon rope or maybe even steel chains.

>>31707 I was looking at 3D metal printing and ran across this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Js3bJ1B8ySM It seems that "per weight( or specific strength), regular plastic is not so damn weak. A 4gm test piece of PLA+ held 154 lbs. before it broke. And most of the weight was the ends of the test piece. >I wonder what the ideal "rope" would be whether it is steel cable or nylon rope or maybe even steel chains. Strongest would be 4mm dyneema or UHMWPE Braided Cord(same thing). WOW! Black 1/8"(Dia.) 2200Lb $37.95 100 ft. Nylon would likely be WAY cheaper and good enough. The chain I reference below is less strong and more expensive but...using metal chain like this can be used as part of a motor, #35 x 100 ft. Zinc Plated Steel $48.47 Working load limit of 106 lb.[actually price per strength is not so bad. This is "working load" which is way less than breaking load]. The other ropes are shown, breaking load. https://www.homedepot.com/p/Everbilt-35-x-100-ft-Zinc-Plated-Steel-Sash-Chain-806600/203958837 Another picture of copper coated, https://cdn11.bigcommerce.com/s-e7e21/images/stencil/1200x1800/products/127986/328788/apii9rkiv__89322.1592325935.jpg?c=2 I was surprised by the low cost of UHMWPE. In the past I thought that the price for UHMWPE was really high. It must have come down or I didn't closely compare. Maybe the Chinese are driving the price down. I think the cheap price for UHMWPE is because it's actually polyethylene. The same stuff everything is made of. Plastic bags etc. But if I understand correctly, they make the poly chains much when they make the new plastic. They stretch them to align with each other. Now the long chain plastic molecular links are not extremely strong individually but they are so long that there are a huge amount of them and all the little molecular bonds add up to a really strong plastic. The big problem with this stuff is it's hard to tie knots or to connect it because it's so slippery but I'm sure that can be over come. Another problem is this stuff has NO stretch at all. So it would make poor tendons which need some stretch. They have nylon 1000 lbs. paracord [they say 1000 but...]for less which might be fine and stretches. $8.99 100 ft.

>>31403 >Capstan actuators are cool, quiet, and efficient! Github: https://github.com/aaedmusa/Capstan-Drive Yes, very interesting. But I guess this will only be usable in some places, since it is big. I also found this here. Since I always had the idea of springs or stretching rope for muscles in the back of my mind, I think this idea here is something to also keep in mind. Maybe for making the waifu jump in some cases, or for some fast movement. A loaded spring could be blocked with a solenoid for a little while. >Grasshopper leg explained https://youtu.be/MwIBTbumd1Q >>31576 >Chinese/differential windlasses >>31629 > Old lore, The differential chain hoist. Very interesting. Thanks.

Just as a thought exercise or a benchmark on how much force you can get with electromagnets, which also means EMF motors. I was looking at high power ceramic magnets and they had electromagnets mixed up with them in the site. Here's a couple with prices, Electromagnet with 1/4 in. Mounting Hole - 12V DC/3.3W - 1-9/16 in. dia x 1-9/16 in. thick - 59.54lbs Pull EM4441M6 Now From $20.99 Was: $25.20 | Save: $4.21 Electromagnet with M5 Mounting Hole - 24V/10W) - 110.25lbs Pull - 1-7/8 in. dia x 1-1/16 in. thick EM502027M5 From $35.28 https://www.first4magnets.com/us/44lbs-110lbs-t49 10W - 110.25lbs Pull That's a hell of a lot of force from a small amount of power. Now to be realistic this force is the attraction, likely, to a thick steel plate but a properly designed motor would have some of the same attributes in terms of force per watts, per weight, per size. Makes a good rule of thumb comparison. Say you shave off 20% and you could likely get these figures with a well designed motor, actuator. So with say...40W we could get somewhere around 400 lbs,. of force. That's what I'm looking for. At that level it could easily pick up most humans. We can use this to plan wire size. 40W/48 volts = 0.83 Amps Not a lot. Chart. https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9TdTKLNaH_0/WBsh3YchzjI/AAAAAAAAEfU/BQZ9Nqc8IU80GFdBVoQgy0zwOEzWyI7tQCLcB/s640/wire-gauge-ampacity-chart_460534.jpg 26 gauge wire will handle 1.3A enclosed. So it would be better than needed. I see 250 feet with silicon jacket for $18.48 USD. I also see 1.000 foot, surely enough for more than one waifu, 28 gauge for $39.98. Could cost you a little, maybe even twice as much if you buy from US or European sources. (don't know just speculating) Chinese wire, maybe good, maybe not. Cheap but a risk. Figure in troubleshooting time if they send you bad wire and it may be worth twice the cost for Europe or US wire. Make sure, silicon jacket AND machine wire spec. Other jackets may be just as good but I do know silicon would be up to the job. More research may find stuff cheaper that will work but silicon jacket is the safe bet. Machine wire is specifically made to handle movement and vibration. Otherwise the wire will break through work hardening as it moves. I did these for myself to nail down some rough cost guidelines and thought I would comment it here. Maybe it will help others.

>>31961 >High pull force magnets It's important to remember you are given the force at contact with steel. Which is pretty close to your guess. >400+ pounds of force at 40W You can indeed get tremendous forces at low currents. The problem is this requires the steel to be touching the electromagnet. Which, would prohibit rotation. Using many of them to create a rotating magnetic field would be more expensive, heavier, and larger than a comparable purpose built motor. What I think you're going towards are solenoids. They will provide the forces at low power you are looking for. This provides you with 2 problems to solve. 1. How will you control the stroke to fit into your needs? 2. How will you retain position without the solenoid becoming a heater? Some helpful links; https://science.howstuffworks.com/solenoid.htm https://audioxpress.com/article/voice-coils-a-tutorial https://www.machinedesign.com/mechanical-motion-systems/article/21836669/what-is-a-voice-coil-actuator

>>31961 >>31978 Thanks, Anons.

>>31978 Great graph. Very informative. >What I think you're going towards are solenoids No I was just showing a general rule of thumb of what sort of forces we could get for what power. I do realize the force they are quoting is directly connected to a thick steel plate. A thin one would not show this sort of force. it would have to be thick. But I have brainstormed solenoid type actuators here. >>9984 >>10002 It's a terribly retarded idea, and likely noisy, but...really cheap and simple.

> (actuator/joint-braking convo-related : >>32321, ...) >=== -minor edit

Potentially a breakthrough increase in motor-efficiency design. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGdIZF5gE7I

>>32828 Interesting, thanks. I kinda thought this was just some AI generated BS, after looking at the thumbnail, so I hesitated watching the video. There's too much BS on YouTube and I on the other hand tend to fall too much for drama. Anyways, there's also some guy providing special software for making motors, I saw him on Reddit or Twitter and YouTube, but don't remember the name. I thought this would just be another layer of difficulty and rabbit hole, but maybe we'll get to this one day. He exists, and some people are interested in it. One thing that interested me before was the alternative of motors without rare earth magnets, or perma magnets in general, since these could get rare or would be a possible vector to ban people from building robots. Good to see that there might now even be alternatives to these induction motors. But this is also just something to keep in mind, doesn't help us right now to get things done. I don't see anyone of us doing this anytime soon. These seem to be build for electric vehicles for now, and the one shown as a possible product weights 39kg (86 pounds). We certainly should keep an eye on it, maybe it will be available as a product for a scooter or paid printing services could deliver something like it one day. Though, then again, the video also says that this is "competitive" engineering and might not be economically feasible. And it's a prototype and hasn't really been tested. So, not really BS, but most likely also not useful anytime soon. Just want to throw in some keywords here for later search: copper printing, 3D printed copper coils, laser powder bed 3D printing, multi-material powder printing

>>32910 >since these could get rare or would be a possible vector to ban people from building robots Great point, NoidoDev. Yes, I've thought about this exact topic many times, trying to find a way around it. Of course, I'm far less concerned about the Chinese resisting robowaifus (also the biggest refiner of rare-earth metals, obvs), and far more concerned about the Globohomo we here in the West are all assaulted by. The troon-thug cycle is far more a personal pressing threat to us all, than w/e Dr. Lee or Mr. Chang think about us. <---> But REM aside, just the cost of the motors assemblies themselves is prohibitive, thus why I was exploring devising our own, opensauce, motor winding systems.

Came across an interesting actuator design on youtube: A 2-stage gearset with a 21.3/1 reduction ratio. Aside from the power he's able to generate with it, he mentions something that I never thought of, that being backdrivability being used to sense external forces applied to the robot. The only glaring issue I can see is it's large size. On a completely function oriented machine like what he's making that's no issue. But on a robowaifu? I'm not sure how easily they can be hidden. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3g2VdduawI

>>33233 Excellent actuator, backdrivability is indeed important for man machine relations. In this case, it appears they are using current sensing to determine position and external torques being applied to the motor. I base this on a lack of light leakage, or dark spots indicating a magnet under the thin white plastic. The B-G431B-ESC1 (https://www.st.com/en/evaluation-tools/b-g431b-esc1.html) would be an ideal ESC to use for this due to its low cost and having plenty of support online. As for the gears, replacing them with eccentic cylcoidal mechanisms would allow for a smaller, more efficient system. Still would recommend adding some sort of grease or lubricant to reduce wear, heat, and drastically increase usable lifespan for the actuator.

Anon-designed, custom servo motor control board. Very cool! :^) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDDD7iGMljw

Remarkably good linear actuator. I'm contemplating reworking my thigh/knee/shin complex to use these instead now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQl6gj_6oa8

>>33282 Update to the actual, working, prototype Jugglebot. Very entertaining Anon, and impressive project progress. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiorGYCZOgk&list=PLe8shy-tVWtqXVAZ4kuTlRkpZlsaZRHAK&index=70 This guy should get to know /hover/ !! :^) https://trashchan.xyz/server/thread/4.html >=== -sp edit

>>33282 >>33283 What's especially-intriguing to me about this Anon's project is that from the outset, his goals for it (ie, womping teh heckin' heck out of those jugglin' balls!111) quite naturally channeled his design decisions into much of the same solutionspace that we here ourselves also need to manage arriving at (cf. >>33356, et al). Key above all others, was his (apparent) innate recognition that mass is everything : ( >>4313 ). His choices based on this single constraint (ie; REDUCE INERTIAL MOMENTS AT ALL COSTS -- aka 'thrown weight') led directly to his distinctly-successful linear actuator design. This success, in turn, directly enabled the success of his agile Stewart Platform approach. While this complex arrangement design won't likely be of much use to us for robowaifus beyond possibly the torso-actuation + collarbone/neck/skull -actuation complexes -- the basic linear actuator's low-mass & responsiveness & (relatively) low-cost & reasonable-manufacturability make it quite-well-suited to robowaifu skeletal actuation in general. Further, the fact that probably >95% of the actuator's mass is concentrated on one end (and therefore able to be arranged proximally to the robowaifu's main-torso monocoques -- thereby further reducing thrown weight+helping to coalesce dynamic central-mass around the pelvic volume geometric pivot-point) is just a big, energy-saving cherry on the top! :^) <---> >tl;dr This must be a kind of joke being played on me rn that I only just now discovered this project. It would have shortened much of the time for my design explorations thus far. Maybe I just needed a little """reminder""" to remember that 'The real prize was the friends we made along the wayduring this long & arduous, monumental climb' , hehe! Actually, I honestly do thank you for everything you've done for me, dearest Lord Jesus!! :D <insert: some_days_you_just_feel_like_getting_out_of_bed.jpg> >=== -prose edit -add crosslink

>>33283 That is one impressive actuator.

>>33315 I'm planning to totally steal his stuff for our waifus. Exploring the options now. Mine should be lighter than his. I wonder what he would think of robowaifus haha. :D

>>33320 BTW, look at this actuator detail I dreamed up a while ago. >>12941 See the motor like his. A little different. There's a cone on the end of the actuator. The pulley to the right has a spring pulling it down. "If" a large force is needed then the pulley is pulled towards the smaller end of the cone on the motor. Giving you a better force, but the motor has to spin more. Auto transmission based on spring constant. His is much better for linear but I think the one I dreamed up would be good for waifus. If I was going to improve his for linear actuators, I would make it like a scissor jack. I think it would be much stronger. Possibly the sprung weight would be higher but maybe not because the scissor mechanism would be lighter and far less cost as a truss wouldn't need carbon fiber which is outrageous in cost. You could use fiberglass. Carbon way more expensive but it is super stiff.

>>33364 >this actuator detail I dreamed up a while ago. Nice work! You're really ahead of the curve with that one, Grommet. :^) >this was my response back then, BTW : ( >>12943 ). I may say I loved the 'CVT power-pull' on that little bike -- smooth as silk. :) I like your ideas about further refinements to your design. We here could certainly all use such a device. To my own thinking, Jugglebot Anon's design is a great (& simple) start, and it's linear-actuation certainly works well with my tiny-mass/high-leverage-coefficient skeletal limb designs. Regardless, keep those ideas flowing Anon. Together, We're All Gonna Make It. Cheers. :^) >=== -prose edit

I was looking at gears and files I had saved and ran across an interesting very high reduction gear system that I had forgot about. A bit difficult to understand. It uses the teeth of gears very finely offset with a separate track to wedge them into place. So two tracks have teeth(gear teeth) slightly offset, and a third forces a flexible wedge into them to align them. Moving the track forward. It's primarily used in motors. The Moon rover used one to drive the wheels. They supposedly are very efficient, have very little to no backlash and compact with high gear ratios. Here's a link to video that shows how they work. Notice the linear example he shows first. Maybe, not sure, this could be set up as an actuator with the "flex spline" being activated or pushed into the two active geared splines by a roller that moves up the linear two splines. For testing these could be 3D printed with two solid gears(splines) and one flexible made with TPU or whatever. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QidXf9pFYo https://www.engineeringclicks.com/harmonic-drive/ In some ways, kinds, sorts, this is like the idea I had to use a ball screw and one solenoid to scoot the balls up one at a time. >>9984 I wonder if you could do the same with these two wedge shaped gears and have a single edge move the parts just like the "flex spline" moves the rotary motion of the gear train in a harmonic drive?? Another way of looking at designs somewhat similar is the action of a farm jack.

>>33531 Uh oh, I'm repeating myself. Sigh...

Fridman interview, Electric vs. Hydraulic actuation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6r6KPuJ689o

>>33990 Nice video. I hate hydraulics but...I could see with some sort of new valve design how it could be super cheap and easy to manufacture.

I'm finally writing down the plan for each movement, using the pattern from here. While listening to some soundtracks to prevent me from getting bored and going back to do something else. This plan might need several iterations, and this is just work in progress. I kept thinking about these things, but then forgetting it again, I really have to write it down. I think it's quite general, so it can fit into the thread here, but maybe it's time to make my own. - release and nudge means having a (soft) lock holding something in place, releasing it and just have some actuator the part into falling into one direction till it is stopped. - I think each movement will need more than one actuator. We need something for slow and something for fast movements. The latter might be limited in range. The precision might also vary. - loaded springs mean springs that are loaded and blocked by a solenoid and can be released to support or carry out a movement. > Head and Neck: > 1. Neck flexion and extension (forward and backward movement) - fast short movement: - forward: release and nudge, maybe multiple stages - solenoid, with a spring? - backward: twisted flexible string in the neck - maybe additional servo somewhere in the neck - slow full movement: - forward: flexible string in the neck slowly released - maybe one servo to pull forward at the end - backward: string in the neck fully twisted and maybe blocked > 1. Neck lateral flexion (side-to-side movement) - one servo for side rolling, two solenoids to lock - fast short movement: nudge and fall down, spring support back up - slow full movement: more in the shoulders > 2. Neck rotation (turning left and right) - fast full movement: maybe at least one loaded spring - slow full movement: more in the shoulders - regular fast movement: at least one fast spine servo, bones connected

>>34130 POTD I'll look into following your lead with my own software functions in my code, NoidoDev. Keep up the great work! Cheers. :^)

I'm sure everyone knows about those carbon nanotube muscles that were ten years away fif***** years ago, but has anyone tried just building the same thing using commercial carbon fiber? It's almost as strong and almost as conductive, so I don't see why it couldn't be used in the same way. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-zXKrBoJGs

>>34133 >carbon nanotube muscles Interesting. Well, how do they work? Has anyone made them outside of a big lab? I looked a bit into it for a moment: >Rotary motors of conventional design can be rather complex and are therefore difficult to miniaturize; previous carbon nanotube artificial muscles provide contraction and bending, but not rotation. We show that an electrolyte-filled twist-spun carbon nanotube yarn, much thinner than a human hair, functions as a torsional artificial muscle in a simple three-electrode electrochemical system, providing a reversible 15,000° rotation and 590 revolutions per minute. A hydrostatic actuation mechanism, as seen in muscular hydrostats in nature, explains the simultaneous occurrence of lengthwise contraction and torsional rotation during the yarn volume increase caused by electrochemical double-layer charge injection. The use of a torsional yarn muscle as a mixer for a fluidic chip is demonstrated. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1211220 >Improved electrically powered artificial muscles are needed for generating force, moving objects, and accomplishing work. Carbon nanotube aerogel sheets are the sole component of new artificial muscles that provide giant elongations and elongation rates of 220% and (3.7 × 104)% per second, respectively, at operating temperatures from 80 to 1900 kelvin. These solid-state–fabricated sheets are enthalpic rubbers having gaslike density and specific strength in one direction higher than those of steel plate. Actuation decreases nanotube aerogel density and can be permanently frozen for such device applications as transparent electrodes. Poisson's ratios reach 15, a factor of 30 higher than for conventional rubbers. These giant Poisson's ratios explain the observed opposite sign of width and length actuation and result in rare properties: negative linear compressibility and stretch densification. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1168312 >Carbon aerogels are elastic, mechanically robust and fatigue resistant and are known for their promising applications in the fields of soft robotics, pressure sensors etc. However, these aerogels are generally fragile and/or easily deformable, which limits their applications. Here, we report a synthesis strategy for fabricating highly compressible and fatigue-resistant aerogels by assembling interconnected carbon tubes. The carbon tube aerogels demonstrate near-zero Poisson’s ratio, exhibit a maximum strength over 20 MPa and a completely recoverable strain up to 99%. They show high fatigue resistance (less than 1.5% permanent degradation after 1000 cycles at 99% strain) and are thermally stable up to 2500 °C in an Ar atmosphere. Additionally, they possess tunable conductivity and electromagnetic shielding. The combined mechanical and multi-functional properties offer an attractive material for the use in harsh environments. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-38664-6 Buying the ingredients might be possible: https://www.acsmaterial.com/carbon-nanotube-sponges.html - But it's around US$200.- per gram. Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Paper: $300.00

>>34139 My understanding is that it contracts because the fibers repel each other when they're charged to a high voltage. Back when it was announced they were talking about it being 20000 times stronger than natural muscles, but after some initial excitement there were no further announcements and people just forgot about it. While I don't know why it was dropped, I'm guessing it's because they never found a cheap way to produce the fibers, which is why I think carbon fiber might be the answer: it's not as strong as carbon nanotubes but it's probably strong enough and $200 will buy you 4lb of it. https://a*****composites.com/shop/fabrics/tow-cord/carbon-fiber-tow The high voltage may pose a problem but I think it could be safely contained using a PTFE sleeve wrapped in foil. PTFE can comfortably handle at least 10kV/mm, and if it wears too thin in one spot then the fibers would touch the foil and short to ground.

>>34141 >expensive and high voltage Too bad. If it's expensive but fast it would be interesting for small movements, like in the face or maybe the hands. But I wouldn't like high voltage there. >I think carbon fiber might be the answer Well, I'd like to see someone experimenting with it. Maybe try to convince people outside of this board. We simply aren't that many people. Or add a task to our "Stop Lurking" thread here: >>20037

>>34132 >I'll look into following your lead with my own software functions in my code Thanks for working on this. I hope you make this into modules which can be easily adapted to something. I could also imagine that I'd like to run the code for the actual movement decentralized on Arduinos. The realization and the command to do a set of movements, the motion planning, and the execution of the commands to the servo might be on different hardware (SBCs and controllers). Some notes from expanding >>34130 >Problems to solve - linear actuator, but hold in place by solenoid blockage - twisted string, freezing with solenoid blockage - solenoid holder, but with a limiter - adjustable spring mechanisms >General: - Any movement that happens automatically through gravity should have a spring that can be loaded and locked. Then the reverse movement is supported by a release of the spring(s). Compliance can be somewhat archived by making these movements not too strong or by using a brake mechanism. Precision isn't important. - Repetitive movement like some dancing moves should also be covered with spring mechanisms. Adjustable by moving the spring linearly a bit.

>>34130 >>34152 Seems that you're interested in dynamic motion with brakes for control. Check out passive dynamic robotics. There's much that can be done using gravity and precise control. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1687814015620967

>>34157 >passive dynamic robotics Thanks. That's certainly interesting. Though, I'm not very focused on walking, and I'm not sure how much this will add to make something walk. I meant it more general. Anyways, it's probably good to keep these ideas about walking in mind right from the start.

>>34152 I might draw and scan something tomorrow. But here are the descriptions. We have to keep such concepts in mind, to design a good system. Not just relying on regular servos. > linear actuator, but hold in place by solenoid blockage Linear actuator in a tube. It being up is holding something. It can move down again relatively slowly (and noisy). But can release faster by "falling down" the tube after a solenoid blocking shaft is released sideways. Of course, another mechanism would need to get the linear actuator up to the neutral position again. > twisted string, freezing with solenoid blockage Some holding mechanism holding the twisted string in that position. The solenoid opened during the twisting of the string with a servo, it goes back to the unpowered position which holds the twisted string in place. > solenoid holder, but with a limiter Just adding a more flexible material in front of the shaft. This softer part is being used to block something. But it can give in, if a certain amount of force is used. The solenoid shaft itself is way stronger. > adjustable spring mechanisms Idk. I'm sure this is a solved issue. Some mountain-bikes have adjustable shock absorbers. I want something like that and smaller variants, but with a small servo that does the adjustment.

>>34130 These are the notes for now. Just posting this as a backup and if somebody wants to think about it himself. I have to think more about the details over time. > Head and Neck, 7 disks: 1. Neck flexion and extension (forward and backward movement) - fast short movement: - forward: release (5) and nudge (1), maybe multiple stages (6) - solenoid, with a spring? Adjustable (3) - backward: twisted flexible string in the neck (2) - maybe additional servo somewhere in the neck (1) - slow full movement: - forward: flexible string in the neck slowly released (2) - maybe one servo to pull forward at the end (1) - backward: string in the neck fully twisted and maybe blocked (2) (4) 2. Neck lateral flexion (side-to-side movement) - servos for side rolling, two solenoids to lock - fast short movement: nudge and fall down, spring support back up - slow full movement: maybe servos in the disks 3. Neck rotation (turning left and right) - fast full movement: maybe at least one loaded spring - slow full movement: flexible twisted strings in the shoulders - regular fast movement: at least one fast spine servo, bones connected > Upper Body: 1. Shoulder flexion and extension (raising and lowering the arm) - Maybe a fast linear actuators - Loaded spring actuators - Twisted string actuators for regular movement - Servos for precision movement 2. Shoulder abduction and adduction (arm away from or towards the body) - servos in the shoulder and chest (breast) - maybe solenoid under the armpits - maybe loaded spring actuator under the armpits 3. Shoulder internal and external rotation (rotating the arm inward or outward) - one servo per shoulder 4. Elbow flexion and extension (bending and straightening the arm) - fast movement: small servo in the elbow - maybe additional twisted string actuator - additional bending spring actuator >>13711 - slow full movement: windlass pulley in the arm 5. Forearm pronation and supination (rotating the forearm to face down or up) - one servo per shoulder - rotation within the (lower) arms with servos >>14474 - maybe also electro-magnets in the two bones (fast, no load) 6. Wrist flexion and extension (bending the wrist up or down) - actuators in the lower arm ... 7. Wrist radial and ulnar deviation (bending the wrist towards the thumb or little finger) - actuators in the lower arm ... 8. Hand and finger movements, including individual finger flexion and extension, abduction and adduction, and thumb opposition >>4577 This is going to be a topic on it's own. Mostly actuators in the lower arm and some small ones in the palm. - palm bending: ... - group of finger bending, and opposite direction: ... - individual finger bending: ... - finger abduction and adduction: ... > Spine and Torso: 1. Spinal flexion and extension (forward and backward bending), 5 disks - small servos in some spinal bones - servos with (twisted, flexible) strings in the hip area and lower torso 2. Spinal lateral flexion (side bending), 5 disks - small servos in some spinal bones - servos with (twisted, flexible) strings in the hip area and lower torso - the water- or airbag holding mechanism 3. Spinal rotation (twisting), 12 - small servos in some spinal bones - pulling the other bones with it if it rotates to a certain extent - servos with (twisted, flexible) strings in the hip area and lower torso 4. Pelvic tilt (tilting the pelvis forward or backward) - maybe one servo > Lower Body >>237: 1. Hip flexion and extension (lifting the leg forward or backward) - huge servos in the hip areas, maybe Capstan actuators - one servo in the back of the hip - to string-pull each leg in series just enough to walk - should probably also bend the knee a bit - string based actuators in the thighs, switching string idea 2. Hip abduction and adduction (moving the leg away from or towards the midline) - rotating uneven disk to push it outwards while normally moving inwards - maybe additional pull outwards for faster movement 3. Hip internal and external rotation (rotating the leg inward or outward) - servos in the thighs 4. Knee flexion and extension (bending and straightening the leg) - servos in the knees - one servo in the back of the hip - to string-pull each leg in series just enough to walk - same as for hip flexion and extension - string based actuators in the thighs 5. Ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion (pointing the foot up or down) - servos in the ankle - maybe additional loaded spring and solenoid in the lower legs - ideally a way to load a spring mechanism when landing with the heel 6. Ankle inversion and eversion (turning the foot inward or outward) - servos in the ankle and lower leg - some string based actuators - maybe additional loaded spring and solenoid in the lower legs 7. Toe movements, including flexion and extension, abduction and adduction - mostly all moving together - servos for slow and solenoids for fast movement - maybe additional spring and release mechanism for running

>>34152 >Thanks for working on this. >I hope you make this into modules which can be easily adapted to something. I could also imagine that I'd like to run the code for the actual movement decentralized on Arduinos. Y/w. I hope to expose every user-directable function as a pythonic API, suitable for scripting from, say, CyberPonk's Horsona library. Even Bash scripting isn't off the table ATP. >The realization and the command to do a set of movements, the motion planning, and the execution of the commands to the servo might be on different hardware (SBCs and controllers). Yes, very much so. Anon's IPCnet is the backbone to allow such distributed, decentralized computing to occur within our robowaifus. >>34167 >I might draw and scan something tomorrow Hope to see it soon, NoidoDev! Cheers. :^) >>34171 POTD This is growing into something important to us here, IMO. Keep it up, Anon!